CONSULTANCY SERVICES TO ESTABLISH AN ENABLING POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN ESA REGION

Award process of the subsequent contracts Each technical offer, deemed to be technically conforming, will be attributed a technical score (TS out of a maximum of 70 points) by adding up the weighted scores obtained for each sub-criterion. Bids having obtained a technical score of less than 35/70 will be deemed to be inappropriate. Award process of the Competitive Multiple Framework Contract (CMCF) with subsequent contracts An overall score (OS out of a maximum of 100 points) obtained by adding together the technical and financial scores (OS=FS+TS) will be attributed to each bid that has been assessed for its technical and financial content. The bidder who obtains the highest overall score will be deemed to have made the most beneficial economic offer and will be awarded the contract. The contracting authority may decide not to pursue the tender for reasons of public interest. Award process of the subsequent contracts The Competitive Multiple Framework Contract (CMFC) with subsequent contracts is a framework agreement with a maximum of three service providers. When a specific need arises, a mini-competition will be held among the contracted service providers, and the most economically beneficial bid will be awarded the subsequent contract. Bids will be assessed separately in accordance with the following Sub-criteria by awarding a score up to the maximum number of points per criterion as set out below: Criterion 1: Price of the services The financial score (FS out of a maximum of 40 points) will cover the comparison of the financial offers of all candidates having submitted a conforming bid. Please note that the maximum unit price determined by the service provider in the financial offer under the framework contract will be the highest price that the service provider may charge for a specific service under the framework contract. Criterion 2: Technical offer Sub-criteria for assessing the technical quality Maximum number of points Sub-criterion 1: Understanding of the Assignment 10-15 Sub-criterion 2: Technical Approach et Methodology etenvironmental approch 10-25 Sub-criterion 3: Relevant Experience et Past Performance of the technical team members 10-25 Sub-criterion 4: Relevance of Management, Coordination et Quality Assurance 5-10 TOTAL 60 Note: Individual subsequent contract may apply modified evaluation criteria based on their specific requirements and expected results.